Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Children of Immigrants Dominate the Olympics

By Ruben Navarrette, Washington Post Writers Group. Posted August 26, 2008.


The U.S. team won the most medals; it also won the argument back home over the contributions of immigrants and their children.
Advertisement

SAN DIEGO -- Now that the flame has gone out on the Olympics in Beijing, it's worth taking a moment to applaud the U.S. Olympic team. Not only for dominating so many events and winning the most prizes overall -- 110 medals, 36 gold -- but also for winning the argument back home over the contributions of immigrants and their children.

The immigration debate has digressed from how to keep out the undocumented to how to keep out those who have documents as well. After all, the real concern is the changing culture, and millions of legal immigrants have helped spur some of those changes.

Still, immigrants don't come empty-handed. They bring their hopes for a better future for their children and a work ethic that often puts natives to shame. And they apply these things to a million different pursuits, including Olympic gold.

Thirty-three U.S. Olympic athletes for these games were immigrants, a number of others were the sons and daughters of immigrants.

Among the immigrants: Sudanese refugee and 1,500-meter runner Lopez Lamong, who served as the flag-bearer for the U.S. in the opening ceremony; beach volleyball player Phil Dalhausser, who was born in Switzerland but now lives in Ventura, Calif.; and gymnasts Nastia Liukin, whose parents brought her from Russia in 1992 and who now lives in Parker, Texas, and Alexander Artemev, who was born in the Soviet Union and now lives in Highlands Ranch, Colo.

Children of immigrants included: gold-medal decathlete Bryan Clay of Kaneohe, Hawaii, whose mother immigrated from Japan; gymnast Raj Bhavsar of Houston, whose parents came from India; and Kevin Tan of Fremont, Calif., whose parents fled China for Taiwan and then California.

But for my money the best U.S. immigrant story of these games belonged to 21-year-old wrestler Henry Cejudo, all 5-feet-4 and 121 pounds of him. Cejudo, who was a long shot to win any medal in Beijing, won the gold in freestyle after defeating Japan's Tomohiro Matsunaga. Cejudo celebrated by breaking into tears and -- after family members in the stands tossed him an American flag -- wrapping himself in Old Glory and parading around the arena.

The road to that victory lap was long, hard and uncertain. The son of illegal immigrants from Mexico, Cejudo was born in Los Angeles but moved around the American Southwest. Raised by his mother after his parents separated when he was 4, he grew up poor and eventually looked to wrestling to save his life. It did.

So did the United States of America. In his moment of glory, Cejudo didn't forget that. He proclaimed his love for his country and settled the question that pokes at so many immigration restrictionists -- that of alleged divided loyalties, the same suspicions that made life difficult for German-Americans and Japanese-Americans in the 20th century.

"I'm proud of my Mexican heritage," Cejudo told reporters. "But I'm an American. It's the best country in the world. They call it the land of opportunity, and it is."

Cejudo had one advantage: his mother, Nelly. She didn't coddle him or tolerate excuses. Instead, while working two and sometimes three jobs, she pounded into his head what it took to be successful in this country.

"I never played the victim," Cejudo said. "My mom taught us to suck it up. Whatever you want to do, you can do, and that's what I did."

That's my kind of mom. And Henry is my kind of American. This country could use more folks like these. As it is, we have an overabundance of people who have more advantages than they realize, but who blame others for their failures.

Those who want to seal off America have a crass term for the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants. They call them "anchor babies" who help keep their undocumented parents rooted here. Some restrictionists even want to amend the Constitution so that, in the future, children born in this country to illegal immigrants would be denied U.S. citizenship in order to make it easier to deport them.

It's a dangerous and despicable idea. Besides, the activists miss the point. It's not the parents who are anchored in the United States. It's their kids -- people like Henry Cejudo. He made his choice. He's not going anywhere. And if you want to pry that American flag -- his flag -- away from him, why, you're going to have to wrestle him for it.

(c) 2008, The San Diego Union-Tribune

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: immigrants, olympics, undocumented immigrants

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Immigration! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Immigrants and illegal aliens are NOT the same thing, stop trying to confuse people...
Posted by: smp2010 on Aug 26, 2008 4:15 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You mention the argument against immigrants. There is not argument that immigrants are good or bad. It is about LEGAL immigrants versus Illegal aliens. I don't see any of these listed as illegal aliens. One was a child of two illegal mexican aliens, but he was born here thus is an American citizen. No one has said immigrants(LEGAL) are not good, it is that ILLEGAL aliens(not immigrants as they have not technically "immigrated" through a legal method of "IMMIGRATION" )are not considered immigrants, and do not bring good things with them. You need to stop clouding the water...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That's right Posted by: LMNOP
Tough but true...
Posted by: jbitch on Aug 27, 2008 9:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those who want to seal off America have a crass term for the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants. They call them "anchor babies" who help keep their undocumented parents rooted here. Some restrictionists even want to amend the Constitution so that, in the future, children born in this country to illegal immigrants would be denied U.S. citizenship in order to make it easier to deport them.


They are the 'anchors' that are used by illegal aliens to secure benefits in this country that would otherwise be denied to them. Navarette does nothing more than parrot endless and useless pap in his attempts to glorify people who do nothing more than use whatever means at their disposal to secure a place in this country as quickly as they can and with no regard for others.

If Navarette is so concerned about the Constitution then he should be dumping the problem of this where it belongs and that's at the feet of these lawbreakers who risk their lives and the lives of these unborn children to gain a quick entry here. He also is clearly ignorant of the history and intent of the 14th amendment to the constitution.

The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 to protect the rights of native-born Black Americans, whose rights were being denied as recently-freed slaves. In 1866, Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th Amendment by writing:

"Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."

The correct interpretation of the 14th Amendment is that an illegal alien mother is subject to the jurisdiction of her native country, as is her baby.


So it isn't Navarette's imaginary 'restrictionists' who seek to undermine our Constitution but rather the illegal aliens who continue to use and abuse any and all means to get ahead at all costs to everyone else. This practice is so widespread that in Korea they even have tourist packages designed for this purpose:

http://www.fileus.org/dept/citizenship/02-05-26-
latimes-birth_tourism_asia.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tough but true... Posted by: Cyberposter
» RE: Tough but true... Posted by: Cyberposter
» RE: Tough but true... Posted by: jbitch
» RE: Tough but true... Posted by: Cyberposter