Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Reproductive Justice and Gender

The Christian Right's Slick Campaign to Make Abstinence Seem Trendy

By Vanessa Valenti, AlterNet. Posted August 28, 2008.


Conservatives finally learned that sheer moralizing doesn't keep teens from having sex. Now they have a creepy new tactic.
Advertisement

Magazines. Fashion. Dating. Comedy. These are all large parts of contemporary teen culture. Who would have thought they could also become the latest weapons in conservatives' war against sexual autonomy?

But after a decade of the Bush administration pouring millions of taxpayer dollars into abstinence education programs, only to see them fail, that's exactly what's happening.

Study after study has shown that those schooled in abstinence rhetoric are just as sexually active as those who aren't, leaving the right wing with virtually no credibility on the subject. Now, conservatives have to be a little savvier if they want to lie about condoms' effectiveness against sexually transmitted infections, make bogus claims about a link between abortion and breast cancer, or manipulate teens into thinking that premarital sex is damaging to one's self-worth. That's why conservative ideologues have taken abstinence-only discourse outside of the classroom and are trying to woo students through a different strategy: by making abstinence the teen trend of the year.

To boost the no-sex-'til-marriage cool factor, conservatives are co-opting everything from teen magazines to fashion to comedy routines. But behind the trendy talk are the same shame-inducing tactics and medical misinformation that could potentially put teens' self-esteem, health and lives in danger.

Abstinence Chic

The 2008-2009 edition cover of J4G (Just 4 Girls/Just 4 Guys) magazine features a close-up of a smiling girl with a fashionable fur-collared sweater, surrounded by brightly colored headlines like "The Inside Scoop on Guys!" This is a pretty familiar image for teens -- no different than what you'd likely see on the cover of Seventeen or YM. But what a young reader may not know is that J4G's "Inside Scoops on Guys" is really a lesson on dressing modestly. The feature tells the young reader that "guys are visual, so when a girl is dressing to show off (wearing tight pants, low-cut shirts, etc.), it is hard for guys because they are stimulated by what they see."

The piece continues its urge to readers: "(S)tart respecting yourself and your guy friends by dressing modestly" -- equating "respect" with wearing more -- and placing all responsibility on girls to tame the wild beast of young men's sexual desires. The diatribe ends with a suggested clothing Web site so female readers can be fashionable and "still be modest."

A project of the Human Life Alliance, J4G is given out to middle and high school students across the country in an effort to present "the importance of abstinence until marriage." The HLA proudly describes the magazine as "cutting edge," contending on its Web site, "The colorful graphics will catch their attention, and the thought-provoking stories and facts on the inside will challenge them to change the way they think about sex outside of marriage."

The magazine's Q&A advice column features Dr. Mary Paquette, who says birth control causes not only weight gain, acne and depression, but abortion. The same goes for emergency contraception. A 16-year-old pregnant girl seeking advice from the doctor is given all of her options, but with an obvious slant: Dr. Paquette describes parenting and adoption as being "selfless," and abortion as "often thought of as a quick fix." She then contends that abortion is a "painful option" and continues: "Women have described it to me as the most awful thing they have ever been through. Women often block out the memory of it and regret having aborted their baby. Not only do these women have lives haunted by their abortion, but they also have an increased risk of infertility, miscarriage and premature babies. There is also a risk of breast cancer in women who have an abortion. Trying to hide your pregnancy with abortion only leaves you alone to cope with all the depression, pain and regret that follow."

Coming from a doctor, teens are likely too see this as a reliable and accurate source of information, despite the fact that all of these "risks" have been disproved by numerous studies, including the National Cancer Institute's findings in 2003 that abortion is not linked to breast cancer. The magazine fails to inform its readers that Paquette works at AALFA Family Clinic in Minnesota, which identifies itself as a pro-life Christian clinic. Not surprisingly, the clinic does not provide birth control or emergency contraception.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: abstinence, sex education, abstinence-only education, teens and sexuality

Vanessa Valenti is a New York-based freelance writer and an editor at Feministing.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
war on sex, war on drugs
Posted by: cordas on Aug 28, 2008 12:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reading this article openned my eyes to something, I don't know if I have just been unobservant before but it sure seems that exactly the same tactics are being used in both fights with exactly the same effects.... Neither are working.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: war on sex, war on drugs Posted by: pure_genius
Knowledge is key
Posted by: pure_genius on Aug 28, 2008 1:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I spent most of my childhood in the foster care system. Most of that time was spent in the Bible Belt. I was nine years old when I first learned basic sex ed. I was in a juvenile detention center with kids who were 14 and 15. The educator used a condom and a cucumber.

I didn't have sex until I was 18 and I used protection. There are a multitude of reasons why I waited, but the primary one was not wanting to get a girl pregnant at that age.

I knew so many kids who were going to church every Sunday and being taught abstinence. They engaged in some of the most risky behavior.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Knowledge is key Posted by: Sissy
» RE: Knowledge is key Posted by: PumbyUmpkin
» As a former musician... Posted by: wolfgangmo
» RE: As a former musician... Posted by: ranchero42
False advertising
Posted by: LMNOP on Aug 28, 2008 1:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I nearly fell out of my chair when I read the lede, "Conservatives finally learned that moralizing doesn't keep teens from having sex."

No friggin' way! Next you'll be telling me that they realized that lying doesn't work either.

Then I read on and confirmed that that comment was just an inaccurate teaser to lure potential readers into the column, including people like me who simply refuse to believe that the Christian right realized that moralizing doesn't work and stopped doing it. No way.

Of course they haven't learned that lesson and never will. Never.

How does moralizing in teen zines and through lame Christian comedians not constitute moralizing just the same? And whatever would make anyone think that preaching "abstinence only" in this embarrassing and sure to fail wrapper wasn't moralizing or was an example of these Neanderthals learning?

I guess that we can look forward to another generation of butt sex from the little abstinence-only madonnas. LOL.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

todd
Posted by: toddlip on Aug 28, 2008 3:24 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watch out for those evil Christians, trying to prevent kids from having sex.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: todd Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: todd Posted by: kwms
» RE: todd Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: todd Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: todd Posted by: LMNOP
» ssegallmd Posted by: emmas
» RE: todd..Pest Control Posted by: BigElectricCat
» RE: todd..Pest Control Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: todd Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: todd Posted by: Gisele
» RE: todd Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: todd Posted by: Turiye
» RE: todd Posted by: hms2004
» Hilarious.... Posted by: Fencerider
» RE: Hilarious.... Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: Hilarious....it really is. Posted by: Fencerider
» RE: Hilarious....it really is. Posted by: BigElectricCat
» RE: Hilarious....it really is. Posted by: Fencerider
» RE: Hilarious....it really is. Posted by: BigElectricCat
» RE: todd Posted by: Jbuuty
» RE: todd Posted by: NWCrow
» RE: todd Posted by: Romans1
» Huh? Posted by: NWCrow
» RE: todd Posted by: Jbuuty
» RE: todd Posted by: wwittman
The UK Government's Advertising Strongly Encourages Teen Sex - Using a Condom
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 28, 2008 3:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Government advertising campaigns on commercial music radio targetting teenagers to use a condom are similar to their repetetitive drug awareness advertising.

I doubt if it has much if any effect on behaviour, but there is an argument that such repetetive advertising actually encourages such behaviour.

Kids don't want to miss out. They want to conform to the norm.

Whilst I have no objection to education and awareness, the continual indoctrination via radio advertising becomes extremely boring and is largely irrelevant cos most teenage kids spend most of their time on the internet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not "safe" - "safER" Posted by: truthlover
» RE: Not "safe" - "safER" Posted by: Intellect
What I find so amazing
Posted by: Sissy on Aug 28, 2008 3:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is for all the bellicose rants of the Christian Right against abortion, they also rail against birth control. The Bush dictatorship even refuses aide to poor county's that want to educate their people against having too many babies. Judges are sought who will overturn Roe vs. Wade, states are denied funds if they don't incorporate abstinence in their curriculums, but yet once those babies are born they can go to hell or to war, whichever comes first.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» why is it so amazing... Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: why is it so amazing... Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: why is it so amazing... Posted by: Jbuuty
» RE: why is it so amazing... Posted by: Intellect
» RE: What I find so amazing Posted by: john mont
» RE: What I find so amazing Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: What I find so amazing Posted by: Jbuuty
» RE: What I find so amazing Posted by: crashgrab
» They're sociopaths Posted by: LMNOP
» yikes... Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: They're sociopaths Posted by: Cathyblj
» Maybe - I'm not certain Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: They're sociopaths Posted by: BigElectricCat
» RE: They're sociopaths Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: They're sociopaths Posted by: BigElectricCat
» RE: They're sociopaths Posted by: LMNOP
» What happens in Vegas.. Posted by: BigElectricCat
A little of the subject but:
Posted by: Science1 on Aug 28, 2008 4:01 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having just returned from Beijing for a 19 day trip for the Olympics and sightseeing, I made
one overall observation.

The Chinese people were very happy, patriotic
and had observably apparent strong family values.

Yes and they did this without organized religion.

My observation only confirmed my feeling that
religion is all about power and control and of course money. This article made a clear statement concerning how the "abstinence issue"
is really more about power and control over
all aspects of reproduction.

Personally I feel the Christian Right, is
a group more to be concerned about then the war, economy and illegal aliens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A little of the subject but: Posted by: annekarina
» RE: A little of the subject but: Posted by: austex_chris
» reality in China Posted by: zorro
Ugh... teen magazines...
Posted by: synx on Aug 28, 2008 4:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every time I see teens reading "teen magazines" it makes me despair. The fact that they read those things of their own volition shows what a sickness they have in their mind. Colorful advertisements, consumption and guilt, glorifying shallowness, and stroking people's ego for getting all morally righteous. Forget the abstinence message, the only message these magazines deliver is that you shouldn't be content with your life, and that you're a good person if you force other people to feel that way too. Abstinence was never about avoiding sex; it's all about making teens feel bad and insecure, so they stay tied umbilically to their dearest taxpayer funded fundamentalist church, until they're too enmeshed in the insanity to ever escape. Pawns for the corporate elite to use to ruin our votes and our communities, and to destroy what few among us are able to see the snowballing corruption cracking our society apart at the foundations.

I fully support censoring what impressionable teens are allowed to experience, but let them play all the violent video games they want! Shower them with pornography, gay, splatter, whatever floats your boat! Just keep them away from those goddamn teen magazines, away from sitcoms and soap operas, cruel mind viruses of the most unctuous and penetrating, and for God sakes, don't let them watch all that commercial advertising!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ugh... teen magazines... Posted by: herronsmith
The nerds and dorks fight back
Posted by: rugger on Aug 28, 2008 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, I'm fat, ugly and unpopular and can't get laid.

Here's an idea, let's try to convince everyone else that that's cool.

brilliant strategy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cover up, Girls! It works in Iraq & Afganistan
Posted by: terradea42 on Aug 28, 2008 4:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you cannot see where this is leading, simply look at the Muslim countries. The same tactics and lies about sex are used to control the people. And it works. Women dress very modestly. And instead of guilt or shame, women who engage in sex before marriage get killed. Talk about an effective abstinence program! Go Religion!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some teens
Posted by: robchapman on Aug 28, 2008 4:31 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I recently showed Denzel Washington's Great Debaters to a group of young adolescents taking part in Upward Bound.

During a scene showing two of the Debaters in bed together in the morning post coitus, several students spontaneously called out, "Oh they are in TROUBLE."

There are adolescents who want to be good people. They are willing to uphold high standards of morality in all matters including sex.

Adolescents who are willing to commit themselves to high standards of sexual morality and behavior need and deserve our support.

Whatever problems we have politically with the Christian Right should not blind us to the importance of giving young people a period of time to develop themselves without the pressure and intrusion of sexually based relationships.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Some teens Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: Some teens Posted by: BeckyD
» RE: Some teens Posted by: BreeMass
» SO Right on, Beck (as always) Posted by: Cathyblj
» RE: Some teens--BAD ANALYSIS Posted by: lexicon
» RE: Some teens--BAD ANALYSIS Posted by: robchapman
» RE: Some teens Posted by: wwittman
Rosta Ruck
Posted by: davescott on Aug 28, 2008 5:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush and the GOP right have undoubtedly done real harm with this foolishness, like the rest of their foolishness. But I've gotta think this particular idiot message is one very tough sell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Better Idea.
Posted by: fred_53_99 on Aug 28, 2008 5:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I got a better idea for these jerks. Why not start a movement to ban any sexual acts on tv and movies. Really boy cott all programs with sexual content. Think about it most of the sex in entainment is between persons not married. The kids won't wanna screw if they don't hear the media selling it 24/7/365. It's a dumb Idea? no more than expecting teens living in a sexually charged culture not want to have sex. Or just have em join a cult.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Better Idea. Posted by: everton9
» RE: A Better Idea. Posted by: trying.to.evolve
» RE: A Better Idea. Posted by: everton9
» really? Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: A Better Idea. Posted by: crashgrab
Mathew 25:41-45
Posted by: fred_53_99 on Aug 28, 2008 5:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The right wing does not read this passage"For when I was hungry ,you did not feed me. I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink. I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clother and you didi not clothe me. I was sick and in prison and you did not vist me.They will answer Lord when did we see you like this? He will reply whatever you didn't do for one of the least of these you did not do for me"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mathew 25:41-45 Posted by: john mont
» ?????? Posted by: Fencerider
» LOL Posted by: LMNOP
Hmmm...Abtinence Doesn't Protect Children from Pedophiles
Posted by: Elurby on Aug 28, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
#######
#######

Liberals' advancing liberalism sexually
molests babies and children.

How?: by removing the SACRED from human
sexuality and framing it as a recreational
sport.

Can abstinence protect babies and
children from the SICK results of
liberals' anything-goes SEXUAL REVOLU-
TION--particularly those babies and
children abused in child-porn?

Read Dr. Judith Reisman's report on the
stunning increase in sex crimes against
babies and children:

"Child-porn crimes have gone from a
rarity on federal court dockets to
a phenomenon, with prosecutions
jumping nationally from a scant 30
in 1995 to more than 2,100 last
year....Typically, they are catching
successful people - engineers,
businessmen, professors and lawyers
- who are under the false impression
that their habit is personal,
harmless and anonymous."

If abstinence doesn't work to corral
teen sex, then it won't work to corral
adults who like to diddle kids.

Go figure, you-tolerate-everything
liberals!

#######
#######

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOL (no text) Posted by: LMNOP
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
WRONG WRONG WRONG!
Posted by: jrmart on Aug 28, 2008 5:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHOA, wait just a friggin minute! I am as radical a left winger as there is but this article, well written and I presume well intended is just plain WRONG.

When 13 and 14 year old have sex, this is SEXUAL AUTONOMY???

I deplore the radical Christian right but I deplore just as much those that see everything, every idea and every action of them as "scary" and vicious and mean minded and short sighted and conspiratorial.

If you think unbridled sexual activity of early teens is their right, is part of their "autonomy" then your a real danger.

The use of "slick" ads and promotions is used successfully and widely throughout the marketing world. Why is it wrong to use it to try to reach those impressionable minds?
Do You advocate teen sex?

Just what is wrong with using modern advertising techniques to teach sexual responsibility.

I am shocked to find this attitude in a forum that is usually sane if not fair and balanced.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Puritans... Posted by: wolfgangmo
» RE: WRONG WRONG WRONG! Posted by: BeckyD
» RE: WRONG WRONG WRONG! Posted by: BreeMass
» RE: WRONG WRONG WRONG! Posted by: crashgrab
» No unbridled sex? Posted by: LMNOP
» LMAO!! Posted by: BreeMass
A little Something To know...
Posted by: Godfather89 on Aug 28, 2008 5:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a man with a spiritual path, as such, it is my belief that sex is meant for those who love each other. This love however, does not need marriage to prove this love and commitment. So in effect if the two love each other and are committed to each other and have sex than I see nothing wrong even if they are not married.

It is acting upon that lust on someone else that holds people down, not because you'll burn in hell when you die but because, it can lead to unwanted things like STD's, Unwanted Pregnancy, Relationship Problems (especially if you are with someone else). If your single and acting upon the lust after someone that you dont know from a hole in the wall than you put yourself at risk.

Plus their is scientific proof that people who love are far more happier than people who lust. Sexual Lust is more so a youth thing because as you get older the lust wheres down and most people come to realize that lust is not as powerful nor worth as much as love.

While I am not in a relationship right now, I have still abstained -despite the comprehensive sex ed- from sex, it is my belief that the religious right has no right to influence teens like this. It is also my belief that when I find the girl I love, I don't care if we are married or not, I will make love to her and I will not hold back nor be guilty for doing so.

So basically it needs some self-control.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 -